Missouri Educator Community

A Place for Missouri Educators to Connect

This is the next FREE BOOK post. To be considered, just make a comment!


My reflection upon reading Rethinking Homework: Best Practices That Support Diverse Needs, and

speaking with Cathy Vatterott at the ASCD Annual Conference in San Antonio, TX this March.


When I was in high school, I associated homework with “work” and learning with “class.” I didn’t often complete my homework because it wasn’t
until I was back in class that the learning took place. At times, I
found practice to be helpful, but I would often choose to stay after
school with teachers who would do homework alongside me; other
assignments would be left undone or–gasp–copied from friends.


I never liked homework because I was happy to learn through extracurricular practice. I loved Marching Band, Symphony, acting, and even a few sports. I hated doing work that I felt was “filler,” just
something to take up my time in the name of being busy.


The perpetual cycle of homework assigning, procrastinating, copying, failing, collecting, grading, re-assigning, berating, complaining about, mindlessly completing, guessing and stressing is one I gave up
on a long time ago. When I made it to college, I realized that most of
my “homework” was assigned in an unwritten and self-directed fashion
that supported some larger goal or project in a course. There was no
mass-assigning and grade milling going on.


I neither had the option to pad my grade with busy work nor to fail because of my failure to learn what should have been taught with me. My first job in the professional world (that is, outside of campus and
service stations or grocery stores) proved to provide a similar
incentive to learn on my own. If I wanted to advance or do better at my
job, then I had to take an interest in something on my own time.


My boss would always answer questions and I wasn’t expected to take on extra work, but it was inherently rewarding to do so. The synthetic and tedious practice of using homework as a measure of learning is one
that many teachers leave unexamined. It’s done because, well, it always has been and well, gosh I’d be the easy teacher if I didn’t assign homework! If I’m the easy teacher
then I’ll lose my professional standing, control of my class, and I’ll
end up with a bunch of worthless slackers next semester! Is this really
a student-minded reason for either assigning homework or not?


Cathy Vatterott doesn’t think so. Her book examines the cult of homework in schools today. Through the lens of an experienced middle level teacher, she shows us that parents, teachers, students, and
administrators have been going back-and-forth on the practice for a
century. The debate has been fueled by varied political entities, the
media, and maybe even a teacher or student here and there. The most
significant shifts occurred during periods of national struggle. The
cold war made us fear that we were behind the Russians in the Space
Race and so we packed our kids’ bags with science and math books and
told them to study more.


In the 1980s, we experienced extreme economic strife and so our malaise and mediocrity were attributed to, of course, the lack of homework and rigor in schools; still, more was piled on without much
consideration as to why. In my own comparison, I would liken the
increase in homework to planting all of your fields full of tobacco.
Short term gains are high, but if there’s trouble and you can’t sell,
it won’t feed your family. Homework provides a short term illusion of
engagement, productivity (gives teachers and students that “checklist
high”), but ultimately it does very little to produce a person who can
create new knowledge that is useful to society.


I assigned myself a bit of homework while considering this book’s effect on my practice: a sonnet, 14 lines of poetry (mine has a fairly open meter and no rhyme) ending in a punctual couplet. I also chose to
remix one of Shakespeare’s most well known, Sonnet 18.

Homework

Shall I compare thee to simplistic rote learning?
Thou art more widely accepted without question
and disproportionately contributory to student failure
than most problems. Hast thou no desire for good?
Rough winds do you keep from childrens’ faces,
those darling buds indoors, no gold complexion
or hope of leasing summer’s date. Thy eternal risk
of rising mediocrity do you warn, by chance our nation
do you serve with rigor, but ’tis it at cost of vigor?
Your policy, with ease is enforced, moving onus
from thee on high, your hot eye–the office–shines
top-down upon complacent workers, suffering virtuously.

So long have these carrots, these sticks taunted
So long lives this–homework–and takes life from thee.


Are there good reasons for assigning work outside of school? Perhaps. “Homework” is mostly a keyword in this book for things disconnected, unsupported, and graded. Vatterott (and I) are condemning
the equivalent of unfunded mandates in education. Students shouldn’t be
sent home to do things they can’t do without your support.


What do you think about homework?

Views: 59

Tags: homework, poetry

Comment

You need to be a member of Missouri Educator Community to add comments!

Join Missouri Educator Community

Comment by Steve J. Moore on April 29, 2010 at 8:32pm
Thomas, I'll be sending you a copy of Vatterott's book! Congrats!
Comment by Thomas Maerke on April 14, 2010 at 12:01am
A few responses:

1. Steve - I didn't mean to put words in your mouth by making that blanket statement about homework being bad. It was a point that I envisioned some educators might make in this discussion, and I simply wanted to make my views known.

2. Aaron - the idea of "true learning" being organic is an interesting statement. I'd love to hear more about it. I'd also like to hear how it might fit within the context of an actual curriculum, and not just English, but other subject areas as well, especially advanced math classes.
Comment by Steve J. Moore on April 6, 2010 at 8:03pm
Thank you for the thorough and thoughtful reply Thomas. Here's where my sail caught your wind,

"To make the blanket statement, 'Homework is bad and no teacher should assign it,' is ignorant of all the good opportunities available to students outside of the classroom."

I hope I wasn't too hyperbolic in my own expression about the topic. I have written other times about being even-handed and hope I haven't ignored my own advice! Part of it may have been the fact that Cathy Vatterott was such a great speaker and I was all charged up about it while I was writing this post at the ASCD Conference. (It was a busy time!)

I think you're right on about the enriching possibility of extension beyond the classroom. What I see as the current problem is that our current view and understanding (collectively) of "homework" is flawed; it's nothing close to what you and Aaron Eyler describe.

Also, I have a near identical weekly library structure built into my school week. The kids love it and I love playing connector as well :)
Comment by Steve J. Moore on April 6, 2010 at 7:41pm

Comment by Thomas Maerke on April 2, 2010 at 1:02pm
Nice remix of Sonnet 18. I love remixing myself, and having my kids take something well known and remix it for their own purposes.

I think the bulk of the discussion can be spurred on by your final paragraph: “‘Homework’ is mostly a keyword in this book for things disconnected, unsupported, and graded. . . . Students shouldn’t be sent home to do things they can’t do without your support.”

The definition of homework is an essential starting point. If it is “work sent home for students to do, which they cannot do without support,” than yes, it can be nothing but an ineffective learning opportunity (if it should even be called that) and discouraging for the students. If I were to assign to my students a worksheet for homework through which they were expected to master the skill of parallel structure, without giving any instruction, I would certainly be setting them up for a discouraging time – and in the end I would be discouraged as well.

If homework is used to allow students to continue exploring an idea or principal which they are in the process of learning or to provide extra practice in applying a skill, then I think it can be effective. If, as homework, I were to ask my students to revise a writing piece for parallel structure, after having a mini-lesson on the skill during our workshop time, then I think the “homework” can be a good challenge that was supported and can show positive results in the student writing. (I think this is a decent example because of the tight schedules that some schools are facing, while the argument could easily be made that this type of revision should be done during the regular school day).

If, in a photography class, students were told to memorize the history of photography for a quiz, then we could condemn the homework for not asking the student to create new knowledge (even though historical knowledge could be worthwhile in helping the student understand subject matter or composition). If, in the same photography class, students were asked to try their hand at capturing the decisive moment, as done by Henri Cartier-Bresson, then they would benefit from knowledge of history and exploring their world outside of the classroom; this certainly could be seen as beneficial “homework.”

What I think is most important is that we don’t talk in absolutes when discussing homework, or anything in education for that matter. To make the blanket statement, “Homework is bad and no teacher should assign it,” is ignorant of all the good opportunities available to students outside of the classroom. To think that students must be in a classroom to learn or must be in direct contact with teacher support to thrive while doing an assignment seems to me to be a short-changing of students’ abilities (and their own support system outside of school).

Steve, I think you also make a really good point about the learning opportunities away from the classroom and apart from homework. Extracurricular activities are so important for students’ learning and do offer transferrable skills that apply to the classroom, even though grades may not be attached. I always encourage my kids to be involved, to find things they are interested in, and to explore the opportunities available to them, mostly because I know they will learn and grow in these situations, but also to trick them into staying busy.

As for my classroom, I assign the same thing for homework every day: read for at least 20 minutes. We go to the library once a week, they can read pretty much anything they want, and I check by keeping track of their page numbers. They can easily lie to me if they want, and some do on occasion, but mostly they’re honest with me about not reading or not liking a book. When I help them find really good books that they take interest in the results are usually amazing, and not in some assignment that I require them to do, but in the conversation that takes place with me or fellow classmates as share what they’re reading. My job in supporting them in this situation is helping them connect with books that are engaging and interesting and fun to read, and occasionally keeping the connection going. (Today, since a student is reading about Motown and asking me questions about it, we listened to the Motown’s #1’s album as we researched on the computers - this is why I value my job, being a connector). I figure the percentage of time that kids read is higher than the time that they don’t, and I know this because the other teachers have to take reading books away from kids because they’re reading when they’re not supposed to. And, when kids return after being in high school for a few years, they often talk about how much they read in middle school, and how much they miss getting to read what they want and have conversations about books – rather than being required to read a book and do one assignment after another on it.

I feel like I’ve been long winded, so please forgive me. I’m very interested in what others have to say, so let’s get this discussion going.

Forum

Pass the Word - TweetChat with Chef Jeff for Culinary and FCS Instructors

Started by Christine Hollingsworth in Education Oct 19, 2010.

The MEC is MOVING!

Started by Steve J. Moore in Education Jul 22, 2010.

Join us for the Missouri Educators Weekend Tweetup

Started by Gina Hartman in Education Jul 20, 2010.

Where in MO are you from? 34 Replies

Started by Steve J. Moore in Uncategorized. Last reply by Andrea Blanco Jun 24, 2010.

Help--How do you grade 180 elementary school papers? 4 Replies

Started by Aimee P. Sarver in Education. Last reply by Steve J. Moore Jun 23, 2010.

Edu Bloggers Wanted! 5 Replies

Started by Steve J. Moore in Education. Last reply by Steve J. Moore May 9, 2010.

Will you help us win a $25,000 Pepsi Refresh grant? 2 Replies

Started by Christine Hollingsworth in Education. Last reply by Gina Hartman Apr 3, 2010.

How to Update Profile Pictures

Started by Steve J. Moore in Education Mar 21, 2010.

MAESP State Conference Presentation 3 Replies

Started by Addie Gaines in Education. Last reply by Addie Gaines Mar 10, 2010.

What Do Students Need? 1 Reply

Started by Steve J. Moore in Education. Last reply by Steve J. Moore Mar 4, 2010.

Missouri Educators on Twitter

Follow us on Twitter and engage in the mobile conversation.


If you're on Twitter and you're not listed in the Missouri Ed network then message Steve to be added. Your responses will appear in our RSS feed on the sidebar here on the Ning.

Birthdays

Birthdays Tomorrow

Notes on Nings

This site is adapted from and inspired by Tom Whitby's EduPLN Ning which represents a global collective of education stakeholders.

NASSP, "Shifting Ground"

Want to see a great school community in action? Check out St. Joseph's Digital Express Created by Sean Nash

Online Safety: An Essential 21st Century Skill
by Kyle Pace

© 2013   Created by Steve J. Moore.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service